Quantcast
Channel: Campaign Chronicle
Viewing all 260 articles
Browse latest View live

Another year done!

$
0
0
This must have been our most confident campaign yet, a function perhaps of the ten year review earlier in 2017 which reminded us of things we had managed to do in far less amenable circumstances. But the ease also came from the enthusiastic energy of our Campaign Associate, Malavika Ravi, who managed the logistics of the campaign with far less stress than we have felt in years gone by. Or at least, we are grateful that is the impression with which she left us. She has brought great enthusiasm and warmth to this year's campaign and we look forward to her hanging out with us for some years to come!

Thanks also to Santha and Sudaroli whose quiet back-room support and self-effacing attention to detail took a great deal of the load off the Campaign Associate's shoulders.

Thanks to our wonderful partners and the participants of our programmes. We have made many promises and we will now turn our attention to keeping them.

2018 is the last year of the third cycle of our 16 Days Campaign. The run-up to 2017 was quite taxing although the fortnight itself was relatively chilled out. We will take a call on the shape and substance of the 2018 outing much later this year, and it will depend on how vividly we remember the pain. In any event, we will see you then!

Eight campaigns done... and here's looking forward to obsolescence, as always!

Day 2, 2018: Letterbox Resistance

$
0
0

 For the second day of our campaign, we brought back one of our favourite campaign events, The Letterbox Resistance. This year we took it to the human rights department of Ethiraj College for Women.

I have loved the idea of Letterbox Resistance since the day I heard of it and I was delighted to have it in the 2018 campaign calendar. While I was looking forward to it I wasn't certain about the response. But Swarna Ma'am who loves Letterbox Resistance showed up at the college with her excitement and enthusiasm to give the girls an introduction to the activity and the objective behind it. She had to rush to her other appointment and couldn't stay longer with us but she did write her letter!

We left the group size to the department to decide and found that 30 girls were waiting to see what we were going to do and it was a nice surprise to have the six girls from WCC who had come to volunteer with Prajnya join the activity. While we were setting up in a sunlight-filled classroom, spreading out all the colourful stationery we had brought along for this activity, most of the girls looked at us with blank faces. This expression didn't last long once Swarna ma'am introduced the activity and the idea behind it.

Once the introduction was done, everyone moved to the table at once to pick the letter writing materials of their choice and soon a hush fell over the classroom as everyone got to their writing. In a few minutes, a few letters were done, as words poured out effortlessly for some, while others took time to craft their letters.
Amidst the rush of clicking photos of the letters and uploading them on Facebook, I noticed that though the girls seemed hesitant and unsure at the beginning about the whole letter writing business, they were soon writing multiple letters addressed to different people. The letters they wrote were addressed to their parents, the society, friends, their assaulter; some wrote poetry while some doodled.

At the end of the event, I couldn't resist asking the girls what they thought of the activity, and how it made them feel. Most girls commented on how this activity made them feel a range of emotions and made them find the words to articulate it.

I felt the same. By the time I finished my letter I had gone through an array of emotions. But at the end, I felt liberated.

Do check out more of these letters, here

Day 3: No Recourse: A symposium on women workers' rights and safety

$
0
0



The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 covers all working women and all categories of workplaces, providing a redressal mechanism that informal, unorganised and self-employed workers can also access. There are several challenges to that access: that those mechanisms are not set up (the Local Complaints Committees); that people do not know about them, and that they are hard to access. 

Workers' rights are a central concern for Friedrich Ebert Stiftung and workplace sexual harassment compliance is an important part of Prajnya's work. So we came together to organise this programme.In the programme that we planned, we brought together a keynote speaker, two overview panels, one on construction and garment workers and the other on domestic workers, and a brainstorming session. We also added a valedictory session. 

The speakers we had listed on the programme were: Jaya Arunachalam, WWF; Mageshvaran, NASVI TN; Geetha Ramakrishnan, UWF; Sujata Mody, Penn Thozhilalar Sangam; Renuka Bala, CWDR; Sister Valar, NDWM TN; Sister Clara Pitchai, TN Domestic Worker Union; Lawyer Selvi; Geetha Narayanan; Kannagi Packianathan, Chair, TN State Commission for Women.

The keynote speaker was unable to attend for health reasons. The panelists were delayed. And the valedictory speaker finally had to cancel. But everything truly works out for the best! We had a roomful of people eager to share their experiences, so we just turned the programme into an open mic and invited everyone to come speak. There were actually men in the room, which was a good thing too because gender programmes tend not to draw male participants. 


The result was a rich mosaic of perspectives and anecdotes. The discussion in the afternoon was able to quickly go to action planning and there was agreement that coordinated action was the need of the day. 

Women's Christian College English department students rapporteured the programme and a proper report will follow. A link will be added to this post. 

Day 4: Community Cafe at Chrysalis

$
0
0
We went over to the Chrysalis office during the lunch hour and were joined for a free-flowing conversation by about twenty team members.

While the conversation began with a sharing of close-at-hand experiences of violence, it quickly went on to a shared feeling among the women present that nothing we did was enough, or good enough. We discussed expectations placed by patriarchy on women and on men. We swapped notes on the 'festival of guilt' which surrounds all of us. Every choice appears to require negotiation--if this is easy for me, that one is difficult--whether work, responsibility, life-style or leisure. What emerged was a collective exhausted lament, punctuated by a great deal of laughter.

We then brought the conversation around to the root cause of all this--patriarchy. Patriarchy, its privilege, entitlement and impunity.

As people working in the field of education, how do we exercise our responsibility to change this? We discussed the content of books, the cases and illustrations. Participants shared how there was also push-back when they used examples like women firefighters--boys could not find anyone to relate to, they were told.

Community Cafe chats are always inconclusive although they end with a little shpiel on bystander intervention. The issues that emerge organically cannot be resolved in a little over an hour and the hope is that the conversations continue long after we leave.


Day 4: A Conversation about Gender Violence in Graduate School

$
0
0

A Report by Alice Iannantuoni and Charla Waeiss


While the public reckoning over issues of gender-based violence and discrimination on university campuses has increased over the past few years, it has rarely focused specifically on the experience of graduate students. Pursuing postgraduate schooling such as master’s and doctoral degrees, graduate students get specialized training to access particular professions such as medicine or law, conduct research in labs, work as teaching assistants or course instructors, and so on. Their position between bachelor’s students and faculty members results in a unique set of challenges when it comes to the impact of gender on their campus-related experiences.

This Wednesday, November 28, 2018, the Women and Gender in Global Perspectives Program (WGGP) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) hosted an event titled A Conversation about Gender Violence in Graduate School, as part of an ongoing satellite campaign to Prajnya’s 16 Days Campaign Against Gender Violence on the UIUC campus. Prajnya’s founder and Managing Trustee Dr. Swarna Rajagopalan herself pursued graduate school and earned her PhD at UIUC, and it was in Urbana that she initially laid the groundwork for creating the organization. As current grad students in her very same program, we were excited to take her up on the suggestion of bringing the 16 Days Campaign Against Gender Violence to UIUC.

In the context of the growing awareness of gender-based violence and discrimination on university campuses, this event allowed us to focus specifically on the circumstances of graduate students. These circumstances are important for a number of reasons. First, graduate students are involved in a unique set of power dynamics: they can hold positions of power over undergraduate students, as teaching assistants or instructors, while also serving as a one of the first points of contact for undergrads when they themselves experience discrimination or violence on campus. The interactions between graduate students also include various power structures, especially when they involve more junior and more senior graduate students. Furthermore, graduate students work closely among each other, often forming close relationships that span being colleagues, friends, mentors, and sometimes being romantically involved. Lastly, they interact with faculty members in a variety of ways: as advisees, employees, colleagues, or co-authors on research projects. Faculty members thus hold varying degrees of control over a graduate student’s professional life and future career––by virtue of assigning her grades, advising her work, collaborating on research, writing recommendation letters, and so on.

Secondly, graduate students who face gender-based discrimination or violence are in a unique position due to the tight-knit nature of many academic departments and disciplines. Especially for those who wish to pursue a career in academia, it is crucial to maintain a good reputation in their discipline’s circles and not to alienate any gatekeeper of future professional opportunities. Therefore, the stakes for coming forward or speaking out can be high; and accountability for perpetrators, particularly those in senior positions, can be low.

Lastly, these issues intersect with other aspects of a graduate student’s identity in consequential ways. First-generation students with little exposure to the norms and implicit practices of academia might not have a good sense of what the relationship with one’s advisor should look like, for example. International students coming from academic backgrounds in countries other than the United States might have different expectations about the hierarchical structure of a department. Students of color and LGBT students might have a difficult time seeing themselves represented in the composition of their departments and disciplines, and experience discrimination not just on the basis of gender, but also on the basis of other components of their identity—often in combination with each other.

In addition to shedding light on these dynamics, this event provided an opportunity for graduate students from different disciplines to connect and discuss the commonalities in how gender impacts our experiences in graduate school, the University resources which we have found useful, as well as the additional resources that we would like to see be made available and the community and campus culture that we want to help build. Sarah Colomé, the Director of the Women’s Resource Center at the University, and Anita Kaiser, the Assistant Director of WGGP, also joined the event to provide their own perspectives on the resources and tools available to graduate students when facing gender-based violence and discrimination.

Altogether, the conversation highlighted many more similarities in the attendees’ experiences than it did differences: from the types of behaviors grad students are subjected to, to the shared fears and concerns regarding speaking out, to the challenge of striking a balance between academic responsibilities and the time-consuming and emotional work required to keep fighting for cultural change. Beyond recognizing similar experiences, the discussion was empowering. It not only pointed out institutional resources available at the University but also ways to build relationships with fellow grad students across departments to push for change both within and outside of our own academic circles. By the end of the event, it was clear that this was only the first of a series of conversations about gender-based violence and discrimination among graduate students––at UIUC and beyond.

Day 4: Men Talk Consent at Madras School of Social Work

$
0
0
As part of the 2018 Prajnya 16 days Campaign against Gender Violence, we organised a Men Talk Consent at Madras School of Social Work. It was a session planned for men only conversation and was facilitated by Mr. Sandhiyan, our go-to resource person for Men Talk Consent.

Jackson Katz, a cultural theorist, says, "We talk about how many women were raped last year not about how many men raped women".  We always discuss violence against women as a women's issue but what we fail to acknowledge is that it is a men's issue as well. And that is the idea behind the Men Talk Consent. We want men to be a part of this conversation as well.

Mr Sandhiyan facilitating a discussion with the students
On the 28th November, around 20 students from MSSW participated in this 2-hour long session which started with an icebreaker followed by an open discussion on the impacts of gender, masculinity norms, roles and stereotypes and more. The session ended with the boys forming groups to design a poster to showcase their understanding of consent.

Mr. Sandhiyan at the end of the session said, "This is only the beginning. It was an eye-opener session for many students, who didn't think of consent this way. At the end of the session, they were able to acknowledge the pressure the society and the peers put on them in terms of acceptable male behaviour and sex. Many of the posters created were about what they think about consent and it gives us an insight into their thinking. But, this is just the beginning. We need to do follow-ups to facilitate a deeper understanding of the issues related to consent and violence against women. More such discussions have to be organised to raise gender-sensitive men".

The students preparing posters 
One of the posters designed by the students to show their understanding of consent





























On behalf of Prajnya, I thank Mr. Sandhiyan Thilagavathy for facilitating this session.

Day 5: Film Screening and Discussion on Gender Violence

$
0
0
On day five of the 2018 Prajnya 16 Days Campaign against Gender Violence, we took the documentary movie on Shahjehan Apa to Stella Maris College for Women. Our intention was to engage the students in a conversation around dowry. The 29th of November which also happens to be the International Women Human Rights Defenders Day was the perfect occasion to recognise Shahjehan Apa's contribution to the anti-dowry laws of India and the women's movement.

Around 30 girls from Stella's Damini Club had signed up for the screening and discussion. Most of these girls were from the sociology and arts department. The 88 minutes long movie is an interaction of the interviewer with Shahjehan Apa in different settings - home, office, community. We learn about Shahjehan Apa's early life, how she witnessed her daughter's death - a dowry death which propelled Shahjehan Apa to step out of her house and fight for the rights of women. The movie also sheds light on Shahjehan Apa's non-profit organisation Shakti Shalini and its work as a shelter home for survivors of domestic violence.

An informal discussion was moderated post the movie. The discussion was started with a fairly simple question of what they thought about the movie. Soon the girls shared their awe of Shahjehan Apa's life story and her achievements, especially coming from a conservative background and fighting for better laws for women across the country. The girls then proceeded to talk about dowry in present times - the contemporary dowry. The girls listed down the manifestations of the present day dowry; in forms of lavish weddings, expensive gifts, passive demands and more. Professor Millie Nihila, too, joined the discussion and added an interesting point, " The bride's family are scared that if the groom's family don't take dowry then they might ill-treat their daughter".

A few girls voiced their feelings about how such lavish weddings and certain customs make them feel as if they are not enough. One of the students mentioned that while she tried to have a discussion about this with her mother, she couldn't broach the subject with her.

The discussion ended with the group acknowledging the need to realise the normalisation of dowry in our current society, and the need to hold these conversations with their family.


Day 6: No Place for Us in Chennai: A symposium on the gendered impact of forced evictions

$
0
0

Governments in a hurry to check off contemporary development indicators sanction public and private sector projects that too often require the vacation of land where people live and which they may also use for subsistence farming. This land is acquired for a variety of purposes with one major consequence: displacement. 

Forced evictions contribute significantly to the feminization of poverty and displacement, and alongside that, a host of negative consequences for women and girls. By extension, they also impact others genders in particular ways. 


Penn Thozhillar Sangam (PTS) has been a crusader for the rights of many evicted communities in Chennai. Prajnya and PTS came together to organise this half-day symposium to address the gendered impact of forced evictions. 

The invited speakers for the symposium were Satyarupa Shekhar, CAG; Vanessa Peter, a policy researcher, Geetha, a lawyer; Katheeja Talha, an architect; Ranjitha Gunasekharan, assistant editor New Indian Express, Sangeetha, PTS secretary and PTS members from evicted communities living in Gudapakkam, Perumbakkam, and Morai. The Chennai Housing Secretary S. Krishnan IAS was also invited to join the open discussion and give valedictory remarks. 

While Geetha and Ranjitha couldn't attend the event due to personal reasons, the event proceeded as planned. Following an interesting presentation by Satyarupa Shekhar on smart cities, the PTS members took to the floor to share their grievances. Following the session on community experiences, Vanessa Peter's talk summarised the problems faced by these communities. The next session was an open forum facilitated by Katheeja Talha and Sujata Mody. At the end of the session, housing secretary, S. Krishnan IAS, joined the discussion and heard the complaints and suggestions of the community people. 

The session ended on a high note with mutual appreciation shown by the housing secretary and Prajnya and PTS. 


Women's Christian College English department students rapporteured the programme and a detailed report of the programme will be added to this post. 




Day 7: Short Takes: What Women Write at Women's Christian College

$
0
0
As part of the 2018 Prajnya 16 Days Campaign against Gender Violence in partnership with the English Department of the Women's Christian College we organised a special edition of 'Short Takes'. Short Takes is a short event with 4-6 TED-Style talks of 10 minutes each, on different aspects of a subject. The talks would be followed by a Q & A with the audience. 

For this edition, we decided to speak on women and literature. The question was, what do women write? 
The speakers were invited to speak on one of the following topics:

1. The Novelist and the Novel: Writers of fiction, especially of the novel which was identified with women writers. 
2. Writer as Heroine: Memoirs, autobiographies, letters and journals. 
3. The Witness and the Chronicle: Women writing non-fiction, such as biographies, histories, essays on politics and other real world subjects. 
4. Truth or Dare: Gender-based violence defines women's possibilities; does it have to feature in literature in order to authenticate a woman's voice?
5. The Seduction of Patriarchy: Romance novels and family sagas as 'chicklit,' written (mostly) by women for women. 
6. Writing from the Shadows: Writing that brings other gender and sexuality perspectives to life.

From the department, three pairs of speakers and two individual speakers had signed up for this event. The first pair spoke about the seduction of patriarchy, especially in chicklit written by women for women. Contemporary examples of Twilight, Hunger Games etc., were given to emphasise their point of how chicklit stereotypes women. Popular tropes in romance novels were discussed to state how women are described in these novels and how contrasting it is to reality. 

The second pair of speakers spoke on gender-based violence featuring in literature and its need to authenticate a woman's voice. One of the speakers of this pair had placed this question to the audience which elicited interesting responses. Majority of the responses seemed to lean towards the need to feature gender-based violence incidences in literature at least to raise awareness about violence against women. 

The third pair of speakers spoke about writing from the shadows, especially LGBTQ representation in literature both in terms of writers and protagonists, with a focus on Indian literature. The two independent speakers spoke about the topics of women in chicklit literature, and violence against women depicted in novels. Their talks were combined with the first two pairs of speakers respectively due to the relevance of the topic. 

The Q & A at the end of each session and the broader discussion at the end of the event brought forward realisations how patriarchal stereotypes define women and minorities in literature and most importantly our easy acceptance of it. 


Women's Christian College English department students will be adding a summarised report of the event to this post. 




Day 9: Domestic Violence Workshop

$
0
0


On the 9th day of the 2018 Prajnya 16 Days Campaign against Gender Violence, we scheduled a workshop on Domestic Violence. The workshop was conducted at our office in partnership with Roshni, our partner organisation who work with self-help group women. Twenty five self-help group women from Roshni participated in the workshop. 

The workshop was designed in an interactive mode with activities and films to talk about what is all about domestic; what does the domestic abuse mean; what are the myths related to the domestic abuse; the cycle of violence; how does it impact the women and children in different ways; legal framework to combat domestic abuse; how to approach the police and how can the FIR be filed; what is the importance of bystander intervention and what steps the bystander can take to protect the women in distress.

It was really an interactive session where women mostly related the incidents happened in and around their lives. At some point of the workshop, they were split into pairs and allowed to choose a chit which had commonly believed statements around domestic abuse like "Jealousy is the sign of love', "Smashing things is not abusive, it is just venting" etc. And the groups opened up the discussion around the statement they got.



Also, various short films were shown on types of domestic violence, how it impacts children, and how the bystander could intervene and a discussion was built around the movies.

The workshop was closed with the distribution of the flyer 'Call For Help'. The subject of the workshop was very serious but then it was built with the laughter and fun by the women. There were few women who came up and asked for the help and was referred to the self providers. Their energy still remains in our office space to keep us in momentum to work tirelessly towards ending all violence against women.

Day 10: Equality, Diversity and Safety: A tweetchat on Workplace Sexual Harassment

$
0
0
On day 10, we scheduled a Tweet chat on workplace sexual harassment which was facilitated by Dr. Shakthi S. The tweet chat was a scheduled from 12 - 2 pm.

The tweet chat began with open questions to twitter community on workplace sexual harassment

Here are some excerpts:


Day 12: 'But, What Was She Wearing?' - Movie Screening at DG Vaishnav

$
0
0
As part of the 2018 Prajnya 16 days campaign against Gender Violence, we hosted the movie screening of 'But, What Was She Wearing?' by Vaishnavi Sundar at DG Vaishnav College.

Around 200 students from postgraduate departments of social work, human resource management and undergraduate departments of English, Maths, Chemistry, Physics, Commerce attended the screening.

This 2-hour long movie covered the various ways in which sexual harassment manifests in the workplace; featured survivors of workplace sexual harassment and analysed the 2013 workplace sexual harassment act.  Around 27 women from various fields featured in the movie, who spoke on sexual harassment topics and shared their personal experiences as well.

The movie screening was followed by a 20 minutes Q & A session with the director of the film, Vaishnavi Sundar who is an independent filmmaker, actor, screenwriter, and activist from Chennai. Some of the questions asked by the students were around Vaishnavi's experience during the shoot of the film, her opinions on false complaints, regulatory bodies for ICC and more.


She ended the event by noting that change begins with each and every person and instead of waiting for an enforcing agency to take up the issue of setting up ICC at workplaces, every individual should strive to make the society gender violence free.


Day 8: Ending Gender Violence: Mapping the Road Ahead

$
0
0
On the second Sunday of the 2018 campaign, a small group of Prajnya volunteers and partners got together for a discussion on gender violence activism in post-#MeToo India. Prajnya partners who attended were Sujata Mody from Penn Thozhilalar Sangam, Bader Sayeed from Roshni and Tamilarasi from Human Rights Foundation. Nirupama Sarathy, first Prajnya Campaign Coordinator, who works with several development, human rights and youth programmes, was able to attend. From Prajnya, we had Nandhini Shanmugham (Trustee), Sudaroli (Programme Officer), Nafeesa Usman (Campaign Coordinator) and Swarna Rajagopalan (Founder).

While planning the campaign, it has felt as if we should be acknowledging the #MeToo wave of revelations as an important watershed, and they have been. At the same time, all of us know from the work we do everyday, that even this barely makes a dent in what remains to be done. While all of us are engaged in public conversations around the issues, we rarely sit together and talk. Hence, this breakfast gathering.

Perhaps inevitable in 2018, given recent events, was that the issue we kept circling back to was workplace sexual harassment.

  • Lacunae in the law
  • The government's failure to keep up its obligations
  • Poor compliance, especially training, so that people don't know how to document their experiences
  • Engaging with the discourse on workplace sexual harassment
  • Advocacy with the government on this issue.
The second area that received a great deal of attention was the importance of working with youth. We shared our mixed experiences of doing this, and our views on the best ways to reach young people and students. Nirupama Sarathy suggested that one should speak to young people in the ways that they value, draw them in and then they would stay with a cause. Tamilarasi shared HRF's experience working with schools. We agreed that it was important to reach beyond city-centers to young people in suburban and semi-urban centers around Chennai. 

The conversation inevitably flowed to fundraising challenges, especially CSR. 

After a brief discussion on funds, we reviewed our priorities and in this round, we identified audiences rather than issues: students, panchayat leaders, boys and men, girls in semi-urban and rural areas. We noted that parliamentary elections are imminent and resolved to work more systematically together in 2019. 



Day 11: Swords and Ploughshares

$
0
0

“…they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.”
Bible, Isaiah 2:4
Every campaign has had at least one activity or event that has taken cognizance of conflict and militarisation related issues. This year, on December 5, 2018, we offered a one-day workshop on peace, disarmament and gender equality. 
We opened with an ice-breaker round and quickly got to work. 
The day was divided into three parts. In the first, we reviewed key concepts: peace, conflict, gender and militarisation. 
Participants were first invited to draw a mural of 'peace.' This was the result. (Thank you, N.Shekar, for the gift of the white boards!)


The second session was an exploration of traditional security topics such as arms races, nuclear politics, small arms and disarmament from a gender perspective. We opened with Dr. Seuss''Butter Battle Book', always a good introduction to ideas like deterrence and the security dilemma. Sudaroli Ramasamy introduced participants to small arms and light weapons, and the gender impact of their proliferation and trade. 

The last session was designed to be an active review of the ideas learned through the day. Partiicpants were assigned the task of choosing one issue that brought together four out of the following five: peace, conflict, arms, security, gender violence. They would then design a public education campaign around this. The message they chose was this: Gender violence reduces security so that peace feels like conflict. The negotiation and crafting of this message took up the allocated time, but enthused, most participants have pledged to return in January to carry out this campaign. Let's see! 
A good time was had by all, and going by their feedback, everyone learned something--including the facilitator! 







Day 14: #MeToo #YouToo Survivors Together

$
0
0



The Campaign edition of the Women's History Roundtable Series featured storyteller and our 2014 Gender Equality Mobiliser, Sudha Umashanker.

Sudha had written two fictionalised accounts of workplace sexual harassment that she narrated to the gathering. This was followed by a very lively discussion that covered a great deal of ground from trauma and healing to law to stigma to the consequences of complaining or even sharing publicly. We spoke about social and other support (or lack thereof).

The Roundtable report will be linked here when it is posted on The PSW Weblog.





Day 13: Speak Up! Storytelling open mic for women

$
0
0
On the 13th day of the 2018 Prajnya 16 days Campaign against Gender Violence, Prajnya hosted an open mic storytelling evening for young women at our office. The idea behind the event was to invite young women to a women's circle and create a safe space to share stories of street sexual harassment.

This event was facilitated by our very first campaign coordinator, Nirupama Sarathy. The event started with the nine of us sitting on the floor and writing our name tags and choosing one adjective to define ourselves. Nirupama, then made us all write down the different actions which constitute to street sexual harassment.

With this glaring visual of two charts filled with actions pertaining to sexual harassment in front of us, each of us started sharing our experiences of street sexual harassment. Some of us even found it difficult to pick one story to share. The evening proceeded with laughter and a few tears. A ball of rope was passed between each narrator and we held on to it till it was time. The final imagery was a crisscross of threads which pulled with tension while narrating painful experiences and sagged in relief while the narrator switched to lighter moments and laughter.

We ended the session by letting go of the thread by making one wish. Nirupama then shared some posters on street sexual harassment laws. As the event was coming to an end, most of us felt like we could go on sharing as if a dam had broken resulting in all of us feeling lighter.

I can't thank Nirupama enough for taking the time out of her busy schedule to facilitate this amazing session!


Day 15: Streetside Stories (Podhuveli Kadaigal)

$
0
0
As the title suggests, we wanted to collect stories from the streetside, mainly from women on how they feel coming out to public places, and what they experience and what could improve their experiences. We wanted to reach out to women in public places like markets, parks, bus stands and more and hear their stories.


So, we decided to conduct a volunteer-based research activity as part of the 2018 Prajnya 16 days campaign against Gender Violence. On the 9th of December, when this event was scheduled to happen, we found we couldn't mobilise a large number of volunteers. This being a volunteer-based activity the scope of the project was dependent on the number of data collectors. Owing to the small size of the group - only 5 data collectors in total, we decided to split into two teams and head to one of the popular areas of Chennai - the T Nagar.

One of the teams went to Natesan Park and the roadside shops outside the park, while the other team went to Panagal Park and the area around it. At the end of the half-day activity, around 2 pm, we could only interview 18 women, but what a diverse group it was! We interviewed women from diverse socio-economic backgrounds and age groups. At the end of the day, interacting with women from different walks of life on a particular kind of gender violence gave us all a unique insight into the problem.

This research activity just doesn't end here. We are transcribing the interviews and putting together a detailed report of our findings and observations. We will soon be adding a link to the report here.






Day 16: Human, Woman, Citizen, But - A Panel Discussion

$
0
0
On the last day of the 2018 Prajnya 16 days campaign against Gender Violence, we organised a panel discussion on caste and gender violence at Ethiraj College for Women.

On the 10th of December which also happens to be the Human Rights Day, our panel discussion was aimed to create awareness among young women about caste-based gender violence and human rights violations in the name of caste in India. Through this discussion, we wanted to initiate conversations over a topic hardly ever discussed - the caste politics of Indian society.

On the day of the event, two of our panellists couldn't make it to the event due to unforeseen personal reasons. But our panellist, Semmalar Selvi, Assistant Professor, Department of Social Work, Loyola College turned up on time and presented an interactive talk on the prevalent caste system in India and it's influence on gender-based violence, mainly violence against women.


She walked to and fro the aisle of the auditorium, peppering her talk with questions to the students, and keeping the event lively. Post her talk, she took questions from the students and answered them with utmost patience despite not keeping a good health.


Around 200 students from various departments such as postgraduate studies in human rights, Visual Communications, English, and Arts attended the event. Most of the students were interactive and weren't hesitant to answer Semmalar's questions or raise questions of their own. Semmalar covered a wide range of topics related to caste, culture, and gender; she ended her talk by stressing on the need for questioning - questioning our culture, our elders, and the practices we blindly believe and follow in our Indian society.


With this event, the 2018 Prajnya 16 days Campaign against Gender Violence ended on a great note!






2018 Gender Violence in India Report

$
0
0
On Human Rights Day, we launched the 2018 Gender Violence in India Report, compiled this year by 2018 Rajaram Fellow, Jhuma Sen.

2018 was a year of landmark judgments, horrific reports of sexual violence especially targeting children and #MeToo revelations, and this report provides definitions, data, legal FAQ and a review of recent case law.

As the Introduction notes:
2018 has been a remarkable year in many ways. ‘Gender violence’ has been at the forefront of conversations with #MeToo taking shape in India. In September, several women from the entertainment industry and media publicly accused men in position of power of sexually harassing them; of abusing their positions of power. As testimonies emerged and entered the juridical realm from the social and the political, solidarities too were forged between women cutting across class, caste, gender and other axes of marginality. Significant developments took place in the legislative and the judicial arena as well. Several landmark judgments were delivered by the apex court, leading to decriminalisation of India’s colonial law, especially Indian Penal Code Section 377, which criminalised consensual sexual relationships between same sex adults; decriminalisation of yet another colonial relic, Section 497 or India’s adultery law, recognising that wives were not chattels, allowing entry of women of menstruating age to Sabarimala temple, to name a few. Patriarchy however did not give in without a fight, and as this report was being prepared, feminist movement also saw a tremendous backlash from men’s rights groups and conservative clerics, be it, in opposing women’s entry to temple, or to make the domestic violence law a toothless legislation.
Prajnya’s Gender Violence in India Report has been taking stock of the state of gender violence in India since 2009. This year, the Gender Violence Report has been prepared by R. Rajaram Gender Violence Research and Information Taskforce (GRIT) fellow Jhuma Sen. The Report is meant to be used as a ready reference for activists, journalists, students, lawyers and anyone with an interest in gender justice. The report in addition includes definitions of the various forms of violence, defined internationally as well as in national laws and policies. The data is primarily collected from the National Crime Records Bureau, but wherever possible, other relevant statistics by other state agencies, NGOs, international as well as domestic have been relied upon. Finally, the report also reviews the last year’s significant developments in law, policy as well as important judicial decisions.

We hope you will find this report useful.
Access the report here: http://prajnya.in/storage/app/media/gvr18final.pdf

Short Takes: What Women Write - Truth or Dare: Gender-Based Violence defines women's possibilities; Does it have to feature in literature in order to authenticate a woman's voice?

$
0
0
This is a post of the talk given the students who participated in the event Short Takes: What Women Write held at Women's Christian College on 1st December 2018 as part of the 2018 Prajnya 16 days Campaign against Gender Violence. Read about the event here:
Truth or Dare: Gender-based violence defines women's possibilities; Does it have to feature in literature in order to authenticate a woman's voice?  - Two speakers spoke on this topic as a pair. The first speaker handled the question of women's possibilities being defined by the violence she faces, while the second speaker discussed the need for gender-based violence to be featured in literature.
1.

The term "Gender" is often misunderstood and misinterpreted. The dictionary defines "Gender" as "The state of being male or female. ( Typically with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones.)" So "Gender-based Violence" is nothing but violence directed against a person because of their gender. People of every gender go through this type of violence, but the majority of the victims are women and girls. The very fact that a person takes advantage of another and tries to assert their superiority over them just because they belong to a certain "gender" is rather disturbing but very prevalent in today's society.

To answer the question of whether or not Gender-based Violence defines a woman's possibilities, it is important to understand what a woman goes through after the traumatic experience. Violence to a woman can cause a variety of long-term and short-term physical and mental issues, the most fatal of which is death where the woman is either killed by the perpetrator or in the long run, she turns suicidal. But this is not the only effect on a woman, she is physically injured and mentally traumatised, as a result of which, she is rendered incapable of performing her everyday tasks. When it comes to work, the woman is either thrown out of her workplace or she herself quits her job in fear and shame because the humiliation and judgements thrown at her by the society are far worse than the actual violence. This is also the reason why girls don't talk to their parents about what they've been through, because often times, the actions taken by the parents are extreme: the girls are made to terminate their education and are never let outside their houses, or they are thrown out of their houses because they've brought "shame" to the family. Many girls and young women grow up to be uneducated and unemployed, and statistics prove that nearly 67% of unemployed women are victims of domestic abuse.


If a woman rises to the top or at least tries to make a name for herself even after enduring all the above-mentioned struggles, she is always seen with an invisible tag around her neck, which reads "abuse victim", and that is somehow enough for people around her to dismiss her and never take her seriously; and so a women victim is denied many opportunities in life and many of her dreams and goals remain unfulfilled. Therefore it is true that Gender-based violence defines a woman's possibilities.

- D. Angeline Nikita, II year B.A in English, Women's Christian College

2.

Does gender-based violence have to feature in literature in order to authenticate a woman's voice?

It is rather disturbing that this question even arises as it only seems to prove that women are more readily dismissed than heard and helped in our society.
Women are ambitious, inspiring, hilarious, and much more. Their worth is defined by so much more than their victimhood or the violence perpetrated against them. While the fact that a woman's voice needs “authentication” itself is saddening, it does not have to be done only through the presence of gender-based violence in literature. Social media, television and the internet have emerged as promising platforms for women to voice out themselves to the world and gain solidarity and support.
Traditionally, some authors refer to gender-based violence with misnomers such as “normalized violence” which is violence against women that is naturalized by particularly gendered constructs of heroism, nationalism or domestic space and therefore ignored as a normal part of life. In literature, female characters are most commonly made to meet with any one of the following familiar tropes after she is a victim of a violent crime:  She either becomes an unbalanced person, losing her sense of self and identity, or, she gets rescued by someone else, who is usually a male character. Or, she turns into a revenge-seeking vigilante, working outside the bounds of law in order to obtain justice.
What is interesting to observe in this pattern is how shallow the female's character is painted to be before the occurrence of the violence. She is usually described to be a naive, sweet, romantic and submissive character suddenly changing to become a completely different, more logical and more rational being, all because of the violence committed against her.
Yes, it is true that women are often victims of violence but must that be the only reason for their voices to be heard?
In conclusion, while the presence of gender-based violence in literature may catalyze raising awareness and educating readers of the violence acted against women, it shouldn't be limited to be the only channel through which women's voices are authenticated.
- Betsy Jenifer, II year B.A in English, Women's Christian College






Viewing all 260 articles
Browse latest View live